Where once occupants of even well-equipped airplanes shouted over the din of the engine, now even the rattiest rentals are likely to be headset-ready. Headsets add comfort and safety by improving communications, reducing fatigue and freeing up a hand that once fumbled for a microphone.
If youre an owner with a four- or six-place airplane, however, the bloom fades from the headset rose if you have to equip each seat with a $1000 ANR. Or even a cheaper ANR. So how about a bargain cheapie headset for the seldom-used stations?
Low-priced headsets are tempting bait for bargain hunters, but differences in headset comfort and quality raises the question of whether inexpensive headsets are really a bargain at all. While almost any headset is better than no headset, it can hardly be considered a good investment if its too uncomfortable to wear or it breaks frequently.
For the most part, low-priced headsets include fewer features and less comfort than their higher-priced brethren. In many designs, the guts of the headset-microphone/speaker performance and noise reduction-are identical to higher priced models by the same manufacturer.
Low-end headsets find their markets in several areas. Flight schools and FBOs may buy a bucket of them to offer as rentals, treating them essentially as throwaway items when the wear racks up or they get stolen. Student pilots already under the financial stress of flying lessons may find inexpensive headsets one way to cut costs. Aircraft owners often look for budget headsets for back-up or to equip seldom-used back seats.
Inexpensive headsets make up a substantial portion of the headset market. Quality, performance and comfort vary among the different brands and although some retailers offer liberal return policies, many buyers find themselves faced with one or two choices from an FBOs glass counter and a you-buy-it-you-keep-it attitude.
Low price is in the eye of the beholder, so we set an admittedly arbitrary cutoff point of $150 manufacturer list price. Many of the headsets we reviewed can be bought for substantially less through catalog or internet vendors. In addition, FBOs or pilot shops may also cut you slack on price. Actual selling price on many of these headsets is under $100.
Two factors influence whether an inexpensive headset might be right for you. The first is comfort. Wimpy ear pads and head cushions can be upgraded with aftermarket products such as those from Oregon Aero-see the September issue of Aviation Consumer for a review-but at a price that makes them more expensive than better units.
Comfort is subjective; one persons nirvana is another persons nightmare, so our conclusions about comfort are hardly the last word. But they should serve to reinforce the notion that you should find a retailer who will take the thing back if youre not happy.
The second is quality. Repairing a broken headset quickly becomes uneconomical if its not a quality unit to begin with. You don’t want to throw good money after bad.
We examined a sampling of low-end headsets from AvComm, DRE Communications, Edmo, Flightcom, LightSPEED and SoftComm. In cases where the manufacturer has several models listing for less than $150, we considered all of them and will pass on our recommendations.
AvComm
AvComm, a family-owned company in Covina, California, has been producing its AC-200 for several years, although its now called the AC-200 PNR, for passive noise reduction. The company claims improved speakers give better sound with less weight.
Built of a stainless steel headband and stirrups and molded plastic earcups, the AC-200 is the quintessential low-end headset-simple and sturdy, if not particularly exciting. The headsets old-school wire mic boom is balanced by its gold-plated plugs.
The AC-200 performs we’ll in that the sound and noise attenuation are acceptable for this class of headset, but we think it falls a bit short when it comes to comfort. The headset is okay for an hour or so and as such would be fine for a student pilot, but any longer and the thin headband pad and earpads start creating hot spots.
The ears are worse than the headband, leading you to want to bend the headsets band outward for relief. But reducing clamping pressure decreases noise reduction. Thats true on virtually all passive headsets, but we think that balance can be improved in the AC-200 by beefing up the earpads. Buying aftermarket gel ear seals would help, but would add to the cost. Fortunately, with a list price of $106 and a street price of about $85, you could afford to do that to the AC-200 without breaking the bank.
The AC-200 also has a lot of nooks and crannies that can snag hair, such as the clips that hold the wire to the stirrups. The connection of stirrup to headband and the stirrup pivot point will take on virtually anyone with more than a buzz cut. Even so, the AC-200 is a good effort, backed by a company with good customer service. The company doesnt sell direct, but it does offer a five-year warranty.
DRE-4000
We were looking forward to testing the entry-level products from DRE, given our good experience with DREs $300 active-noise reduction unit, the DRE-6000. We came away with a mixed bag.
The company offers three headsets that fall within the list price budget we set. The DRE-1000, -2000 and -4000 are all similar headsets in terms of construction and performance, with the distinction primarily in the creature comforts afforded.
The true entry unit, the DRE-1000, carries a suggested list of $89. Its a mono unit with a great pair of speakers. It has a wire spring mic boom and a volume control on each earcup. While that may sound appealing, the -1000 has a major shortcoming, in our view, with respect to comfort. The earpads are acceptable, but the headband pad is another matter. If there was a headband pad, that is. Actually, there is a pad, but its too insubstantial to provide much comfort. Athough some might not find this a problem, for us, it made the -1000 a non-starter.
Stepping up to the $129 DRE-2000 gets you a stereo/mono switch, a flex boom and a better headband. The -2000 is, to us, a more comfortable headset with nicer features. Whether its worth it depends on your point of view. On the one hand, its only 40 bucks more. On the other hand, 40 bucks represents a 45 percent price increase. Still, the headband pad remains a sticking point, as even the upgrade takes it only to about the level of the AC-200.
Climb another rung to the DRE-4000, which lists at $149, and you get what wed consider an entry-level headset with the potential to satisfy your needs for some time. The headband pad is thick and comfortable and the flex boom has adjustable length. This is essentially the DRE-6000 without the active noise reduction circuitry.
Comfort is acceptable on legs of a couple of hours, although the ear pads do start feeling hard after that. If you like to listen to music through your intercom, the sound on all three models is excellent- provided you can suffer the discomfort for that long.
DRE headsets arent discounted as much as other brands, so expect to pay closer to list price on these models. The manufacturer sells direct and offers a 30-day return policy if you don’t like them, which in our view is a requirement.
Edmo
The Flightline HS-60 from Edmo is a staple at many flight schools, where its treated as virtually a disposable item when it starts getting creaky. That should tell you something about its price and performance, as most flight schools don’t have the resources to waste money on accessories that don’t fit we’ll in the value curve. With a list price of $129 and a street price under $100, the Flightline has some nice features, such as corrosion-resistant gold-plated plugs, flex boom and stuffed headpads. Its stereo/mono switchable and has dual volume control to balance the listening level.
The company doesnt sell direct, but has a wide network of dealers. The headsets are also available from many internet pilot supply sites, most of which have reasonable policies for returning headsets youre not happy with.
We were, frankly, surprised by the HS-60. Comfort and performance were better than average and on par with the more expensive passive David Clark H10-13.4. The HS-60 would be we’ll served by the addition of gel earseals and even factoring in the cost of those, youd be less than half the cost of a David Clark, albeit without DCs legendary reliability and customer service reputations behind it.
Flightcom
Like DRE, Flightcom has several products that fit within our criteria, the 4DX and the 4DLX. As you might expect from the naming protocols of Japanese cars, the 4DX is the less expensive of the two, with a list price of $115.
Like the other economy models, the 4DX has a couple of shortcomings. The headband pad, a problem spot on most headsets, is a problem here, too, by virtue of how thin it is. But there’s another shortcoming. The design features a wire spring mic boom, with two finger nuts at the knuckles. While this theoretically allows you to tighten the mic in the proper position, one Flightcom rep even volunteered that it frequently goes the other way: The screw gets loose and falls out.
Add a few bucks to the kitty and upgrade to the 4DLX and you get a more competent and feature-packed headset, in our estimation. The problematic wire boom is replaced by a flex boom, the headband pad becomes a wider, more luxuriant affair and the ear cups sport dual volume controls. In our book, thats worth $24 any day. The major drawback of the 4DLX is that its the heaviest among the list we tested – five ounces more than the LightSPEED QFR Solo, for example. In headsets, five ounces over two hours of flying is an eternity.
While we liked the 4DLX, wed like to see it go on a diet – without losing the features that put it near the top of the economy-headset heap when it comes to features.
LightSPEED QFR Solo
Putting on a QFR for the first time feels like putting fish bowls on your ears. The ear cups feel positively cavernous and give that hollow you-can-hear-the-ocean sound. If thats off-putting, fire up the engine and listen to the quiet. At 28.7 noise reduction, the QFR Solo tops the list when it comes to passive noise reduction. Although part of this impressive number comes from rather high clamping pressures, you can bend the headset out a bit for comfort without losing much of the noise reduction.
On top of the quiet, the QFR is also the lightest headset tested, at 11.8 ounces. The weight loss comes almost entirely from the headsets unusual architecture, which gets rid of the classic stirrup-and-headband design in favor of a set of wires on which the headset slides to adjust. The headband is not a hugely padded affair, which LightSPEED can get away with because its supporting less weight.
Adding to the QFRs appeal is the high-quality sound. We plugged one into the home stereo and were very impressed by the sound of music. The microphone also transmits sound with excellent fidelity.
While the headset has a lot going for it, its not perfect. Some of the plastic parts that hold the headset together popped off rather easily on the unit we reviewed. While they snapped back on without fuss, we think that may bode ill for long-term durability.
In addition, the QFR can adjust to fit a very small head, but you may max it out if your head is above average. The other side of this is that the headset folds up quite small-ideal for something that may be stored in the back of the airplane until its needed.
SoftComm
SoftComm Products is one of the low-cost leaders, with six headsets that fall under $150. Four of those are the older-design C-40 series, which includes the C-40, the C-40-10, C-40-20, C-45 and the C-45-10. The fifth-and the most expensive of the lot-is the C-20 Phoenix.